Kenso Grimm
216a972fef
- Add .gitignore to exclude node_modules, dist, logs, and system files - Add comprehensive project documentation including README, deployment guide, and development setup - Add .kiro project specifications for amazon-product-bar-extension, appwrite-cloud-storage, appwrite-userid-repair, blacklist-feature, and enhanced-item-management - Add .kiro steering documents for product, structure, styling, and tech guidelines - Add VSCode settings configuration for consistent development environment - Add manifest.json and babel/vite configuration for extension build setup - Add complete source code implementation including AppWrite integration, storage managers, UI components, and services - Add comprehensive test suite with Jest configuration and 30+ test files covering all major modules - Add test HTML files for integration testing and validation - Add coverage reports and build validation scripts - Add AppWrite setup and repair documentation for database schema management - Add migration guides and responsive accessibility implementation documentation - Establish foundation for Amazon product bar extension with full feature set including blacklist management, enhanced item workflows, and real-time synchronization
112 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
112 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Document
|
|
|
|
## Introduction
|
|
|
|
The AppWrite userId Attribute Repair feature addresses a critical infrastructure issue where AppWrite collections are missing the required `userId` attribute, preventing proper data isolation and causing "Invalid query: Attribute not found in schema: userId" errors. This feature provides automated detection, repair, and validation of AppWrite collection schemas to ensure proper user data isolation.
|
|
|
|
## Glossary
|
|
|
|
- **AppWrite_Manager**: The service responsible for AppWrite database operations
|
|
- **Collection_Schema**: The structure definition of an AppWrite collection including attributes and permissions
|
|
- **userId_Attribute**: A required string attribute that identifies which user owns each document
|
|
- **Schema_Validator**: Component that verifies collection schemas match requirements
|
|
- **Repair_Service**: Automated service that adds missing attributes and fixes permissions
|
|
- **Validation_Tool**: Testing utility that verifies schema correctness
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 1: Schema Detection and Analysis
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a system administrator, I want to automatically detect collections missing the userId attribute, so that I can identify and fix schema issues before they cause runtime errors.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN the Schema_Validator analyzes a collection, THE System SHALL check for the presence of the userId attribute
|
|
2. WHEN a collection is missing the userId attribute, THE System SHALL log the collection name and missing attribute details
|
|
3. WHEN analyzing multiple collections, THE System SHALL provide a comprehensive report of all schema issues
|
|
4. WHEN the analysis is complete, THE System SHALL categorize issues by severity (critical, warning, info)
|
|
5. THE Schema_Validator SHALL validate that userId attributes have correct properties (string type, 255 character limit, required field)
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 2: Automated Schema Repair
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a developer, I want to automatically repair AppWrite collections with missing userId attributes, so that I can fix schema issues without manual console operations.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN the Repair_Service processes a collection missing userId, THE System SHALL create the userId attribute with correct specifications
|
|
2. WHEN creating the userId attribute, THE System SHALL set type to string, size to 255 characters, and required to true
|
|
3. WHEN the attribute creation fails, THE System SHALL log the error and continue with other collections
|
|
4. WHEN all attributes are added, THE System SHALL verify each attribute was created successfully
|
|
5. THE Repair_Service SHALL handle AppWrite API rate limits and retry failed operations
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 3: Permission Configuration
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a security administrator, I want to ensure proper permissions are set on repaired collections, so that users can only access their own data.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN the Repair_Service fixes a collection, THE System SHALL set create permission to "users"
|
|
2. WHEN setting read permissions, THE System SHALL configure "user:$userId" to ensure data isolation
|
|
3. WHEN setting update permissions, THE System SHALL configure "user:$userId" to prevent unauthorized modifications
|
|
4. WHEN setting delete permissions, THE System SHALL configure "user:$userId" to prevent unauthorized deletions
|
|
5. WHEN permission setting fails, THE System SHALL log the error and provide manual fix instructions
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 4: Validation and Verification
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a quality assurance engineer, I want to verify that repaired collections work correctly, so that I can confirm the repair process was successful.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN the Validation_Tool tests a repaired collection, THE System SHALL attempt a query with userId filter
|
|
2. WHEN the query succeeds, THE System SHALL mark the collection as properly configured
|
|
3. WHEN the query fails with "attribute not found", THE System SHALL mark the repair as failed
|
|
4. WHEN testing permissions, THE System SHALL verify that unauthorized access is properly blocked
|
|
5. THE Validation_Tool SHALL provide a comprehensive report of all validation results
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 5: User Interface and Reporting
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a system administrator, I want a clear interface to monitor and control the repair process, so that I can understand what changes are being made to my AppWrite setup.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN the repair process starts, THE System SHALL display progress information for each collection
|
|
2. WHEN displaying results, THE System SHALL show collection name, repair status, and any error messages
|
|
3. WHEN repairs are complete, THE System SHALL provide a summary of successful and failed operations
|
|
4. WHEN errors occur, THE System SHALL provide specific instructions for manual resolution
|
|
5. THE System SHALL allow users to run validation-only mode without making changes
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 6: Error Handling and Recovery
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a developer, I want robust error handling during the repair process, so that partial failures don't prevent other collections from being fixed.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN an AppWrite API call fails, THE System SHALL log the error and continue with remaining operations
|
|
2. WHEN network connectivity is lost, THE System SHALL implement retry logic with exponential backoff
|
|
3. WHEN authentication fails, THE System SHALL provide clear instructions for credential verification
|
|
4. WHEN rate limits are exceeded, THE System SHALL wait and retry the operation
|
|
5. IF a collection cannot be repaired, THE System SHALL provide manual fix instructions
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 7: Backup and Safety
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As a database administrator, I want to ensure that repair operations are safe and reversible, so that I can recover from any unintended changes.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN starting repairs, THE System SHALL document the current state of each collection
|
|
2. WHEN making changes, THE System SHALL log all operations for audit purposes
|
|
3. WHEN critical errors occur, THE System SHALL stop the repair process and provide rollback instructions
|
|
4. THE System SHALL never delete existing attributes or data during repair operations
|
|
5. WHEN repairs are complete, THE System SHALL provide a summary of all changes made
|
|
|
|
### Requirement 8: Integration with Existing Extension
|
|
|
|
**User Story:** As an extension user, I want the repair process to integrate seamlessly with the existing Amazon extension, so that my data synchronization works properly after repair.
|
|
|
|
#### Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. WHEN repairs are complete, THE Extension SHALL automatically detect AppWrite availability
|
|
2. WHEN AppWrite becomes available, THE Extension SHALL sync pending localStorage data to AppWrite
|
|
3. WHEN sync is complete, THE Extension SHALL verify data integrity between localStorage and AppWrite
|
|
4. WHEN conflicts are detected, THE Extension SHALL provide conflict resolution options
|
|
5. THE Extension SHALL continue working with localStorage fallback if AppWrite repairs fail |